Estonian residential tenancies sit inside the Law of Obligations Act (Võlaõigusseadus, VÕS) — the general lease chapter starting at § 271, plus a dedicated set of special provisions for dwelling lease (eluruumi üür) layered on top. If the parties don't agree on a term, or a fixed-term lease simply continues by mutual consent past its end date, the law treats it as an unspecified-term (tähtajatu) lease.
An unspecified-term lease can be ended by either party with three months' written notice under § 312(1) — a simple, symmetric rule compared to many other European markets. A fixed-term lease, by contrast, generally runs its full course; ending it earlier is only possible for an extraordinary, important reason, following the procedure the Act sets out — there's no shortcut for either side to walk away early without one.
A defining feature of the Estonian regime is that its tenant-protective provisions are non-derogable: any lease term that tries to put the tenant in a worse position than the Act allows is simply unenforceable, whatever the contract says.
The security deposit (tagatisraha) is capped at three months' rent under § 308(1) of the VÕS. The tenant has the right to pay it in three equal monthly instalments rather than all at once — a detail that's easy for a landlord to miss when setting move-in expectations.
The landlord must keep the deposit separate from their own assets, at a credit institution, earning at least the average local interest rate (§ 308(2)). That interest belongs to the tenant, is added to the deposit, and is paid out when the deposit is released. The tenant cannot use the deposit to cover rent or utilities while the tenancy runs — it is only settled after the lease ends, the property is returned, and the handover-acceptance act is signed.
Termination is symmetric and comparatively simple for an unspecified-term lease: either landlord or tenant can give three months' written notice under § 312(1) of the VÕS, with no need to state a reason. A fixed-term lease is more rigid — it runs to its agreed end date, and can only be ended earlier for an extraordinary, materially important reason recognised under the Act's general procedure.
Rent itself is collected monthly, alongside the metered utility costs, and the landlord must issue a statement by the 5th of each month. If a tenant falls seriously behind, the landlord can charge statutory default interest and — after a prior written warning — terminate the lease and, where applicable, report the debt to a payment default register.
The VÕS doesn't formally require a handover-acceptance act (üleandmise-vastuvõtu akt), but it's standard market practice — and, in practice, the landlord's strongest evidence when it comes time to settle the deposit under § 308.
The act should record the property's condition and its meter readings at the moment of handover, and it forms the baseline against which the exit act — signed when the tenant moves out — is compared. Without that paper trail, a deposit dispute quickly becomes one party's word against the other's.
Estonian law splits maintenance along familiar lines: the tenant handles minor defects that can be fixed with the kind of small cleaning or upkeep work needed to keep the property in its ordinary condition, under § 280 of the VÕS. Everything beyond that — keeping the dwelling fit for its contractually agreed use — is the landlord's responsibility under § 276(1).
The tenant must notify the landlord without delay of any need for repair, and cannot make alterations to the property without the landlord's consent. Two conditions in the Brokik template go further than the statutory minimum by default: the tenant commits to a full smoking ban in the dwelling, and cannot keep or breed animals there without the landlord's prior consent — both standard, negotiable terms rather than requirements of the VÕS itself.
For an unspecified-term lease, three months' written notice — from either side, with no need to justify it (VÕS § 312(1)). A fixed-term lease is different: it's meant to run its full course, and ending it earlier requires an extraordinary, materially important reason under the Act's general termination procedure.
The deposit (tagatisraha) is capped at three months' rent, and the tenant has the right to pay it in three equal monthly instalments rather than upfront. You must hold it separately from your own money, at a credit institution, earning at least the average local rate — and that interest belongs to the tenant, added to the deposit and paid out when it's released.
Not formally — the VÕS doesn't mandate one. But it's standard practice for a good reason: it's your main evidence when settling the deposit at the end of the tenancy, recording the condition and meter readings at move-in so they can be compared against move-out.
The tenant covers minor defects fixable with routine small cleaning or maintenance work (§ 280). Everything else — keeping the dwelling genuinely fit for the tenant's contracted use — is on the landlord under § 276(1). If it's more than a minor fix, it's yours to handle.
No. The Act's tenant-protective provisions are non-derogable — a clause that tries to put the tenant in a worse position than the VÕS allows simply won't be enforceable, whatever it says on paper.
No — not the tenant, and effectively not you either while the lease is running. The deposit is only settled and applied after the tenancy ends, the property is returned, and the handover-acceptance act is signed; it isn't a running credit against rent.
You can charge statutory default interest on the overdue amount, and after giving a prior written warning, you can terminate the lease for the breach — and, where applicable, report the unpaid debt to a payment default register.